How about this?

The EPA Silences a Climate Skeptic

The professional penalty for offering a contrary view to elites like Al Gore is a smear campaign.

Mr. Hansen, as everyone in this solar system knows, is the director of NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies. Starting in 2004, he launched a campaign against the Bush administration, claiming it was censoring his global-warming thoughts and fiddling with the science. It was all a bit of a hoot, given Mr. Hansen was already a world-famous devotee of the theory of man-made global warming, a reputation earned with some 1,400 speeches he'd given, many while working for Mr. Bush. But it gave Democrats a fun talking point, one the Obama team later picked up.

      ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Except, that is, when it comes to Mr. Carlin, a senior analyst in the EPA's National Center for Environmental Economics and a 35-year veteran of the agency. In March, the Obama EPA prepared to engage the global-warming debate in an astounding new way, by issuing an "endangerment" finding on carbon. It establishes that carbon is a pollutant, and thereby gives the EPA the authority to regulate it -- even if Congress doesn't act.

Around this time, Mr. Carlin and a colleague presented a 98-page analysis arguing the agency should take another look, as the science behind man-made global warming is inconclusive at best. The analysis noted that global temperatures were on a downward trend. It pointed out problems with climate models. It highlighted new research that contradicts apocalyptic scenarios. "We believe our concerns and reservations are sufficiently important to warrant a serious review of the science by EPA," the report read.

So much for

 "I will ensure EPA's efforts to address the environmental crises of today are rooted in three fundamental values: science-based policies and program, adherence to the rule of law, and overwhelming transparency."

-Lisa Jackson EPA admistrator.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124657655235589119.html

headrock wrote: Today???The EPA supresses a report from one of their own.......And then tell them to keep quiet.......Unreal

Did you see this one Headrock? fits in with what you are saying above?

http://www.studentsfordemocracy.net/sfd/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=156375&TPN=1&#253278

odin wrote: I pledge allegiance to the flags of the United States and Israel,

Huh??How has Obama been friendly to Israel??Hes actually been closer to Chavez but thats for another day....

But its sad to see Fleam turn tail and run when there have been so many good Obama stories lately........Oh well.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/26/AR2009062603361_pf.html

Quote: Obama administration officials, fearing a battle with Congress that could stall plans to close the U.S. prison at Guantanamo Bay, are crafting language for an executive order that would reassert presidential authority to incarcerate terrorism suspects indefinitely, according to three senior government officials with knowledge of White House deliberations. Such an order would embrace claims by former president George W. Bush that certain people can be detained without trial for long periods under the laws of war. Obama advisers are concerned that an order, which would bypass Congress, could place the president on weaker footing before the courts and anger key supporters, the officials said.

Maybe one day he'll take the cock out of his mouth and find that maybe giving Obama blowjobs for promises wasnt a good idea....

Quote: After months of internal debate over how to close the military facility in Cuba, White House officials are increasingly worried that reaching quick agreement with Congress on a new detention system may be impossible. Several officials said there is concern in the White House that the administration may not be able to close the prison by the president's January deadline.

Heres my new favorite though..........

Fleam wrote: Restoring science to its rightful place,

Fleam wrote: Straight words to Bush and his supporters: time of playing with scientific study results (hiding and distorting them) are OVER.

Fleam wrote: I don't give a fuck of how many percentage of reps think this or that, when it is Bush administration that has been distorting and scientific study results. The same administration manipulated people to think for example that there is nothing wrong about releasing CO2 into atmosphere.

Today???The EPA supresses a report from one of their own.......And then tell them to keep quiet.......Unreal

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2009/06/28/media-ignore-revelations-epa-suppressed-skepti cal-global-warming-repo

Quote: The day before the House was to vote on a controversial energy bill destined to be the largest tax hike in American history, it was revealed that the Environmental Protection Agency had suppressed an internal report challenging the entire global warming myth.

Obama Depopulation Policy Exposed! Red Alert!!!!!!

Watch the brother of White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, Ezkiel Emanuel, run when confronted with evidence that the Obama administration is preparing to launch a depopulation program

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ho-0SHFEgGo

Give this boy ahmadinejed

a new hat, and what do we have?

Festus Haggan

Festus says